![]() Would anyone find Photoshop and the other Adobe design software and Premier to be a nice UI? It really is function over design. Audition works great for Podcast and Online Education Courses but I used Audacity instead when I did Graduate Class Creation for the College I worked for. Pro-Sumer: That would be like Adobe Audition ( ) which as a UI isn't much better, but it does look nicer and the products have less features and just are not where professionals need to use them. There will be some solutions that almost requires a $500-$2,800+++ hardware piece just so you can actually work with the audio because a mouse isn't always the best tool. They just need something that works and allows them to have a work flow that gives them a great product at the end. Professionals : They do not want pretty and will actually avoid products glorified. You can pay over a thousand dollars for a cleaning suite and the UI would make you cry. Waveform editors and video editors really don't need to be pretty and can easily be DEAD ugly. the Open Source Audor is fairly compariable in terms of UI aka hideous Give me an example for a nice looking OS X audio editor in comparison? I find Pro-Tools (Not a Editor but a Digital Audio Workstation DAW) to be extremely ugly. Perhaps the time has come for Audacity to offer a basic version, with limited effects, and a 'Pro' version (possibly paid for?) that can cater to the advanced user who wants more effects and automation options and won't feel alienated by a cluttered, technical UI. That's going to make the UI situation even worse. They're going to bloat the software unnecessarily at the expense of the average Joe. I may be wrong, but if they pile in more effects and 'advanced' functionality, like any form of batch scripting or API integration. Throw in the ability to trim the sound recording down and some very simple effects such as Amplify, Fade In, Fade Out, and you've got a very good, simple piece of software. Essentially, I believe many people use Audacity as a modern-day tape-recorder. I'm only talking Anecdotally here, based on my own experience, but I would guess that a large number of users use Audacity for it's dead-simple audio capabilities, especially the ability to record sound from an internal sound source (ie recoding the sound coming our of your speakers). I would also encourage the design team to keep in mind what their users actually use Audacity for. I honestly can't even remember what side of that disagreement I would have been on. Matt tells me (I don't actually remember this myself) that this was because Dominic and I had a disagreement over whether to use 2 or 4. Almost every other project does 2 or 4 spaces. Audacity uses 3-space indents, which is incredibly unusual. ![]() ![]() We met up with Dominic and Matt and a guy from Germany whose name I can't remember. Monty (of Xiph fame) was really into Audacity at the time, and I picked him up at the airport and took him to Matt Brubeck's place (mbrubeck here on HN) in Seattle. One of the coolest experiences for me was when we had an Audacity hackathon in 2005 or so. I made a Debian package for it and Dominic asked if I was interested in helping out on the coding too. When I found Audacity it was pretty much just Dominic hacking on it, and it had few users. I had no idea the project would make it so big. I was incredibly fortunate to find it and meet Dominic Mazzoni as early as I did. ![]() Hacking on Audacity was how I spent a lot of my time in college (2000-2004). (EDIT: I missed that the interviewer was Alexandre Prokoudine, a member of the Audacity team from 2002-2012!) I'm amazed that the interviewer knew about it I didn't get far enough to actually merge it into the main tree, and this must have been 10 years ago. Indeed, Mezzo was my effort at creating a really clean API between the audio engine and UI. "Adding real-time effects dock and automation would involve a major rewrite of the audio engine (not to mention redesigning the UI), something like what Joshua Haberman started years ago with the Mezzo project, right?"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |